This article was first posted back in 2011 and then reposted twice thereafter. When Charles Taze Russell (hereafter abbreviated to CTR) dropped into a “dusty dingy hall” just around the corner from his store in 1869 and heard Jonas Wendell speak, it really was the start of something. Most sources describe the meetings as Adventist (Advent Christian Church). However, the background for much of CTR’s developing theology would be One Faith/Age to Come. This is dealt with in some detail in Separate Identity volume 1 by Bruce Schulz and Rachael de Vienne. In fact, the Allegheny meetings accommodated a wide assortment of views as was true for many gatherings in that era. This article (now slightly expanded) examines how they evolved in the 1870s. CTR also wrote about his own independent Bible study activities which no doubt overlapped in these early days.
Illustrated
above are George Stetson’s meetings at Quincy Hall, Allegheny, as reported for
the Advent Christian Church in The Advent Christian Times for November 11,
1873, page 112. Then there are meetings held by George Clowes at the same
location one year later. This time they were listed in The Restitution paper (Age
to Come/One Faith) on November 5, 1874, page 3.
In the early
1870s the Allegheny meetings at Quincy Hall had an eclectic mix. In the early
days Advent Christians and Age to Come believers would often meet together. They
were united on their keen interest in the return of Christ and conditional
immortality, while generally divided over such subjects as the destiny of
natural Israel, how many would benefit from future probation through the resurrection,
which key events yet to happen were timed for the start or the end of the
millennium, and the advisability (or otherwise) of date setting.
As long as
everyone remains tolerant and unofficial and generally disorganised the
situation could continue. But while Age to Come believers of the 1870s were independent
groups who were generally averse to organization, the Second Adventists were increasingly
anxious for recognition as an established religion. This required an official
statement of belief covering not just vague generalities but specifics. As George Storrs would put it, writing in Bible
Examiner for June 1876, page 263, about his distaste for Advent Conferences, “I
have seen this process of organizing conferences, especially, with deep sorrow.
Next come “Resolutions”, theory of course, at first; but presently dictatorial,
next penal, excluding everyone from their body who presumes to preach and teach
what the majority of their body do not wish to have preached among them.”
The logical
outcome from this was described in Bible Examiner (hereafter abbreviated to BE)
for October 1877, page 52, where Elder S W Bishop quotes from a resolution
passed at the last session of The Advent Christian Association, to the effect
that “appointments to preach shall not be passed in their organ, The World’s
Crisis, for anyone who believes...the following doctrines...viz...age to come.”
Bishop relates tales of those preaching future probation being forced out of
churches, and generously peppers his description of the Advent Christian Church
with expressions like “unmitigated bigotry” and “daughters of Rome.”
In spite of the
drift from fellowship to disfellowship, some individuals still managed to
straddle the divide through the 1870s. George Stetson was a case in point. Ordained
by the Advent Christian Church they claimed him as one of their own, and
published his obituary in The World’s Crisis. Stetson wrote many articles for the
Crisis and some of his preaching activities are in its pages. But in the last
few years of his life he wrote more articles for The Restitution, and his
meetings in Edinboro were regularly announced there.
As noted
above, Stetson’s 1873 meetings at Quincy Hall in Allegheny were billed as Advent
Christian. The local man, George Clowes, had also been claimed as Advent
Christian (see for example Jonas Wendell’s letter in The World’s Crisis for
December 27, 1871 where Clowes, recently expelled from the Methodists, was
appointed as undershepherd of the (Advent) church in Pittsburgh. But as also noted
above, by 1874, Clowes’ ministry at Quincy Hall was now claimed as One Faith,
Age to Come.
So which was
it to be? Advent Christian or Age to Come?
While the
group associated with the Russell family no doubt retained its independence,
allowing the majority to link up with Nelson Barbour later, if you had to
attach a label, Age to Come believers in future probation (rather than Advent
Christian) would be it.
This article
will present three lines of evidence to establish this. First, the way their
meetings were advertised in the religious press, and then two key visitors who
had their message accepted by the group.
The first
point we have already covered. The November 1874 meetings where Elder Clowes preached
were advertised in the Restitution Church Directory as Age to Come. As we will
see later, the meetings Clowes attended were also attended by Joseph Lytle Russell,
William H Conley, and CTR. When Clowes died in 1889 Zion’s Watch Tower
published an obituary for him in the March issue (reprints 1110). In response
to a tribute from Joseph Lytel, CTR wrote:
“On Jan’y 25th our dear Brother Clowes, with
whom some of our readers were acquainted, having heard him preach the word of
truth at various points near Pittsburgh, passed away full of triumphant faith and glorious hope.
“Blessed are the dead who die in the Lord from hencefotih. Yea, saith the spirit,
they shall rest from their labors, but their works follow with them.” Previously, in ZWT for May 1886, Clowes had given the opening prayer at that year's Watch Tower Memorial celebration in Pittsburgh (see reprints page 851).
Second and
third, we have two known visitors to the group.
The first
was George Storrs himself, who spent two Sundays with them in May 1874 and
wrote quite a detailed account of his experiences. Before we try and
pigeon-hole Storrs’ theology, it would be useful to outline what happened both
before, during and after his visit to Pittsburgh.
Shortly
after his magazine became a monthly again, Storrs offered his services. As
outlined in his March 1874 editorial on page 162, Storrs offered to preach on
the subject of Vindication of the Divine Character and Government to any group
who would welcome him and offer a convenient Hall. The next issue, April 1874, page
224, noted that C T Russell and Son had been in touch, as had George Stetson in
Edinboro. Another regular Pittsburgh correspondent was C W Buvinger, M.D. (for
example, see BE March 1874, page 192 and February 1877, page 158). Whoever gave
the invitation, it was given promptly and Storrs responded promptly. In the May
1874 BE, page 226, Storrs announced that he would be in Pittsburgh on the first
and second Sundays of that month to speak on The Divine Character and
Government, details of venue to be announced in the local press.
From the Pittsburgh
Gazette for May 2, 1874.
The
announcement noted that “The nature of the subject and the speaker’s ability
should call out a large audience.”
The
following week the paper contained a further advertisement (from the Pittsburgh
Gazette for May 9, 1874):
It noted
that “As Mr Storrs intends starting for home on Monday this may be for many a
last opportunity of hearing him.”
Storrs wrote
up the experience in the June 1874 issue of Bible Examiner. On page 259, his
editorial said that in Pittsburgh he had “found there a small but noble band of
friends who upheld with the full hearts the truths advocated by himself. Among
them is a preacher who was formerly of the Methodists, but is now firmly
settled in the character of the Divine Government as set forth in this
periodical.” The preacher in question would appear to be Elder George D Clowes.
Storrs
reproduced a newspaper review from The Pittsburgh Leader on his talk at the
Library Hall. It mentioned a large audience, although a few left shortly after
he began speaking. In his talk Storrs referred to “the ages to come” (rather than
“age to come”) and stressed that “all men have will have an opportunity, if not
in this life, in another one...Some may call me Universalist. I am in one
sense; I believe that a universal opportunity will be accorded to every son and
daughter of Adam.”
Storrs ended
his review by thanking the friends in Pittsburgh for their generous support
sustaining him and sending him on his way.
Storrs’
visit had an immediate impact. In the same June 1874 issue of BE on page 288,
under the heading Parcels Sent up to May 25 are several well-known names: Wm H
Conley (2 parcels), G D Clowes Snr. and J L Russell and Son (by Express). Sandwiched
between the names of Clowes and Russell in the list is a B F Land. It is only
conjecture on this writer’s part, but CTR’s sister Margaret, who was about
twenty years old at this time, was to marry a Benjamin Land. They had their
first child c. 1876. One wonders when and where they met.
Missing of course
from this list of eager recipients of Storrs’ materials is CTR – other than the
letterhead of J L Russell and Son. However, the very next issue of BE for July
1874, page 320, under Letters Received up to June 25, lists C T Russell.
So key
characters were all in place when Storrs’ visited in May 1874 and preached
about the Ages to Come, and when the Restitution advertised Allegheny meetings
conducted by Clowes as One Faith in November 1874.
In the
December 1874 BE, page 66, a belated letter from Joseph Lytel Russell to Storrs
was published about the May meeting, apologising for the delay and expressing
Joseph’s appreciation for it. Storrs’ responded by saying “Brother Russell is
one of our elder brethren, with whom I formed a most agreeable acquaintance
while in Pittsburgh last May, and I think of him only to love and respect him.”
This suggests
that Storrs and Joseph Lytle only met in the flesh for the first time at those
meetings in May 1874. And there is no mention of CTR in the correspondence, or
in Storrs’ review of his visit back in the June BE. However, assuming CTR was
actually there and not away on business in early May, Storrs would naturally
relate more to those nearer his own age.
So George
Storrs was a welcomed speaker at Pittsburgh, with whom some at least continued
in warm fellowship afterwards.
So,
returning to our main point, what does this tell us about the leaning of the
group he visited?
Was Storrs
Age to Come or Advent Christian?
Storrs would
probably have denied that he was either.
However, his sympathies certainly lay in one direction.
Storrs was
fiercely independent, and had left religious groups more than once already on
matters of principle. One of the founders of the Life and Advent Union in 1863,
he left that body and restarted Bible Examiner in 1871, after accepting future
probation with an inclusiveness that prompted others to accuse him of being universalist.
As noted in the review of Storrs’ speech at Pittsburgh, his standard retort
would be that he did not believe in universal salvation, but rather universal
opportunity.
Future
probation had been a hot potato for both Age to Come believers and Adventists,
with widely differing views within each group. But in the 1870s the Restitution
newspaper at least allowed some debate on what friend and foe would variously
label as the One Chance, Second Chance, Better Chance, Fair Chance choice of
scenario in God’s Divine Plan.
Storrs wrote
a number of articles for the Restitution on this subject – for examples, see
December 9, 1874 (Christ Gave Himself a Ransom for All), December 23, 1874
(Justice and Love) and August 24, 1875 (There is a Flaw). These were part of an
ongoing debate, where some readers accepted the general outline of Storrs’
views. For example, see the letter from John Foore, published in the
Restitution for October 3, 1877, where Foore writes, “I still get The
Restitution, and like it very much; but should like it much better if it could
be opened for the advanced views such as the blessing of all nations and all
kindreds in the age to come.” No doubt Foore, and others of like mind,
would slip this “advanced view” into their sermons.
Storrs’
journal quoted approvingly from The Restitution on a number of occasions; for
example see Nov 1874, page 46, August 1877, page 238, March 1878, page 167 (a
gentle critique of CTR’s Object and Manner) and August 1878, page 327.
Both BE and
The Restitution related the preaching activities of people like the already
mentioned John Foore and his sometime companion John S Lawver. (The latter was
later mentioned in ZWT July 1882, reprints page 367). When a begging letter was
sent to “Dear Brethren of the Abrahamic Faith” (April 1874, page 194) Storrs
printed it, and sent the writer a parcel. Even when disagreeing with the Restitution he still
addressed them as “dear fellow-laborers” and beseeched them to give greater
weight to his views (BE January 1876, page 103).
So Age to
Come groups would generally feel kindly towards Storrs. When illness took hold in
1879, the Restitution published news about Storrs’ condition quite regularly expressing
a genuine concern. (See for example Restitution for June 11, July 30, and
November 5, 1879). When he died he was described as “late lamented” (March 10,
1880) and “highly venerated” (April 7, 1880) in its pages.
So it would
be logical for an independent Age to Come group like the one in Pittsburgh to
welcome Storrs as a speaker.
No such
rapport can be found between Storrs and the Advent Christian Church throughout
the 1870s. One can look in vain for kind words about them in BE.
Instead,
here are a few comments directly from Storrs himself about the Advent Christian
Church and its organs like The World’s Crisis: “Poor old Rome has some very
foolish children...I have nothing but pity for such ...out of their own mouths
they are condemned” (March 1875) –“the Lord only can restore a diseased mind”
(March 1876) –“ the synagogue of Adventists with the spirit of the ancient
Pharasees” (December 1876) – “the same spirit crucified the Lord Jesus”
(January 1877) – “God dishonouring theories” (October 1877) – “perversions of
the word of God” (March 1878) – “I leave them with their own master” (July
1878) and on an article in The World’s Crisis – “very close to blaspheming
against the Holy Spirit” (October 1877).
Some of
Storrs’ correspondents were almost apoplectic when mentioning the Advent
Christian Church, and their comments were printed in BE unchallenged. In
addition to Elder Bishop’s “unmitigated bigotry” and “daughters of Rome” salvos
(noted above) we have such epithets as – “covenant breakers” (June 1874) – “appalling
doctrine” (July 1875) – “most sectarian body...ever found” (April 1876) – “bigoted
and proscriptive...they sustain wicked and unscrupulous people” (May 1876) – “(making
others) subject to the most inveterate malice and hatred” (April 1876) – as
bigoted and sectarian as any other ‘ists’” (September 1876).
Correspondents sent in material on the assumption that Storrs did not
receive The World’s Crisis (for example see March 1878 BE, page 173), and
Storrs himself gave a succinct response to one correspondent in September 1874
BE, page 380: “I never see the A(dvent) C(Christian) Times!”
In a quieter
moment, Storrs summed up his views of both Adventists and Age to Come believers
in an article published in July 1876 BE, page 298, entitled Adventist View in
Error on the End of Probation. He stated “these are painful dilemmas for humane
and conscientious Adventists...it makes them secretly hope...that the Age to
Come advocates are right.” Then, writing about the Age to Come believer, “as he
believes in the restoration of Israel and the conversion of them and the
Gentile nations, and allows both salvation and probation for such beyond the
second advent, he does not burn up the promises of God before they can be
fulfilled, like the Adventist.”
Reading all the
above, I think we can safely assume that, had the Allegheny-Pittsburgh group
been staunch Advent Christian, there is no way George Storrs would have been on
their guest list!
So we have
two lines of evidence as to the leanings of the Allegheny-Pittsburgh group in
1874-75 – first, how they were advertised in the religious press and second – a
point we have labored – how a maverick like Storrs was welcomed.
The third
line of evidence is another visitor they had – this time in 1875. And here we
come to the interesting case of Elder E Owen.
The November
1875 BE contains a trove of familiar names. Under Letters Received on page 64, Storrs
notes two from CTR and one from W H Conley. But a little earlier in this issue
Storrs published the contents of two other letters, one from Elder G D Clowes
of Pittsburgh on page 61 and one from J L Russell of Pittsburgh on page 62.
Both letters
expressed support for Storrs’ labours and showed clearly that Clowes and Joseph
Lytel were still attending the same meetings and remained in tune with Storrs’
theology. They also give a clue as to the continuing character of those
meetings. Clowes (still addressed as Elder Clowes) writes “Brother Owen is
labouring with us”. Joseph Lytel gives a little more detail: “Brother E Owens
(sic) of Portsmouth N.H. has been with us on a visit. We were very much pleased
with him. I think he is truly a servant of the Lord’s, sent to preach the
gospel.”
Elder E Owen
(like George Clowes before him) had been claimed as Advent Christian a few
years before. He is listed in the World’s Crisis’ speaking lists for November
and December 1871, including his home city
of Portsmouth, N.H. (The same listing has a certain Nelson Barbour
preaching in Wakefield, Mass. about the second coming due to occur in 1873).
Owen also had a poem published in the Crisis for January 14, 1874 entitled “We
Want a Pastor”. But by 1875, if not before, he appears to have come to a
parting of the ways.
Storrs
published two of his poems in BE in February and December 1875 as well as
several letters. The key one was in the issue for April 1874 page 216, where,
to use a modern expression, Owen has a bit of a rant.
“When so
called “men of God” advise congregations to exclude from their houses, and
churches, all who believe in the “age to come”, (as was reverently done in this
place), I feel to say, God have mercy upon such leaders of the people: for if
the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch. I am fully satisfied
the Advent people are growing more and more contracted in sentiment, more and
more adverse to investigation; and I am fully aware that spiritual death and
declension is inevitable. May God preserve me and as many as can be preserved
from imbibing so unfruitful a frame of mind.”
Elder Owen
had strong feelings over the increasing gulf between Adventists and Age to Come
believers and how he had personally fared in the controversy. Storrs was more
than happy to print these views; as shown by his comments above, they obviously
mirrored his own.
The next
year, Owen wrote again in similar vein. The situation as he saw it had not
improved. The August 1875 BE on page 330 contains another polemic from him: “The
war wages fiercely. Misrepresentation, legislation, disfellowship and kindred
arguments are brought vigorously to bear...In our State the spirit of
intolerance in rampant, some men refusing to labor with those who entertain the
faith of “Ages to Come.” Poor men...It requires strong decision and moral
courage to face the tide.” In Storrs’ response, he writes: “if those are the
best (arguments) they can furnish their triumph will be short.”
On the issue
of Advent Christians and Age to Come believers, Owen clearly eschewed any
woolly ecumenical feelings and nailed his colors firmly to the wall. In this he
had Storrs’ public support. So when George Clowes and Joseph Lytle welcomed Owen
with open arms in late 1875 and spoke appreciatively of his ministry, it is
obvious which side of the mounting divide they continued to support.
So while the
Allegheny-Pittsburgh group connected with Joseph Lytle Russell, George D Clowes,
William H Conley and CTR may have been independent, its natural home was in the
Age to Come family.
And then
events took an unexpected turn. Charles Taze Russell met Nelson Barbour.
Belonging to a religious group is very complicated. The society briefly published Storrs' beliefs:
ReplyDelete*** w00 10/15 p. 28 ***
What George Storrs Believed
Jesus paid his life as the ransom price for mankind.
The preaching of the good news has not yet been done (in 1871).
Because of that, the end could not be near at that time (in 1871). There would have to be a future age in which the preaching would be done.
There will be people who inherit everlasting life on earth.
There is to be a resurrection of all who died in ignorance. Those accepting the ransom sacrifice of Christ will receive eternal life on earth. Those rejecting it will be destroyed.
Immortality of the soul and hellfire are false doctrines that dishonor God.
The Lord’s Evening Meal is an annual observance on Nisan 14.