The Proclaimers book details how in 1917 and thereafter there was a split between those who stayed with the IBSA and its new president, J F Rutherford, and those who left to form a separate group, which was to split into a number of different groups over time. JFR listed some of these seceding groups in his 1931 resolution when announcing the new name of Jehovah’s Witnesses.
Talking about the Society, the Proclaimers book notes (on page 629) “They did not launch a campaign
of persecution against such persons (though the defectors often indulged in
abuse of their former spiritual brothers.”)
The book notes that they did not persecute those who
left. Perhaps the attitude towards the situation in the early days was well
summed up Pilgrim John A Bohnet in a fairly gentle put-down in The New Era Enterprise (August 21, 1921
“God Blessing the Society”). Talking about the original group formed by those
who left in 1917, he wrote: “It seems to be inoffensive - doing little or
nothing....Some people prefer to be associated with a clique that does nothing
worthwhile mentioning.”
To the end of his life Bohnet would urge these former
associates to reunite and come back into the IBSA fold. See for example his
plea in The Watch Tower for February
1, 1931. Some did. Others did not.
The Proclaimers
book noted that some who left “indulged in abuse of their former spiritual
brothers.”
Perhaps the most outspoken critic of the IBSA in
those early days, whose comments seem positively vitriolic, was Paul S L
Johnson. After CTR’s death he was sent to Britain and the issues there are
described in the 1973 Yearbook.
Johnson was to leave the Brooklyn Bethel along with
others in July 1917. He claimed to be a figure foretold in the Bible. He taught
extensively on Biblical types and shadows and in many cases believed himself to
be the antitype.
This self-view soon caused a rift with the original
group who split in 1917 and by 1918 the inevitable happened and he formed his
own movement in Philadelphia. (See Proclaimers
book pages 68 and 628 and Jehovah’s
Witnesses in the Divine Purpose page 237).
However, there is one curious account from 1920
where Johnson visited Bethel. His account of this comes from the fifth volume
of his extra series of Studies in the
Scriptures from page 237.
It sums up his mindset and why there was little
realistic possibility of reconciliation.
Johnson wanted the Society to produce reprinted
material from CTR’s pen for his group to use. According to his own description he
went to Bethel (quote) “as the hand and mouth of the Lord.” He was asked to put
his request in writing and ultimately was refused, although he was advised that
could purchase the Society’s own publications (which included CTR’s works) to
use however he wished.
According to Johnson the reason given for refusing
his request was because he’d come to the Society as (quote) “representative
priest” and had also written off the Society as “the great company” - i.e. a secondary
spiritual class. Johnson’s response sidestepped this by claiming he’d never
said that in this particular letter. Technically that might have been true,
although he failed to reproduce the correspondence. But Johnson had said PLENTY
elsewhere.
According to Johnson, his visit to Brooklyn dated
from May 17, 1920. And if the account doesn’t have him railing against
Rutherford full-steam as he usually did, it does build up into a bit of a rant.
The same account shows that on the same day, Johnson, this time as (quote)I “anti-typical
Gideon” also called on the original breakaway group, also still based in
Brooklyn. He seemed a little surprised that he had the same negative response
from them. However, his personal attack on them in his publication Another Harvest Sifting Reviewed makes
that unsurprising to oursiders.
So they were strange times, and difficult times as families and friends had to choose and sometimes went in different directions. From the Watch Tower Society’s perspective, however, Proclaimers page 69 says: “Some who withdrew from the organization later repented and associated with Bible Students in worship once again.”
Very interesting insight. Thank you for your research
ReplyDeleteThis is a great article. I did not know that in 1920 Johnson visited Bethel. I like this too: "See for example his [John A Bohnet's] plea in The Watch Tower for February 1, 1931." I did, and saw his plea on page 47. There he said: "No human creature could have written Light unless the holy Spirit of God operated on his mind, actuated his thoughts and guided its utterances. It matters not whether Jehovah individually inspired the volume or had his representative Jesus do it." What glowing praise.
ReplyDeleteAgain, this was a very fascinating and stimulating article!
Thanks for comment, and also for reproducing a bit of J A Bohnet's letter.
ReplyDeleteYou're welcome, it made for fascinating reading and a window into the time period.
DeleteFor more on these matters, see the 1975 Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses for the United States, pages 87-94.
ReplyDeleteAbout Johnson's order.
ReplyDeleteHe described his order for the first time in April 1921 in his journal. Of course, in a very 'theological' way that it is very difficult to understand what he meant (he linked it with Gideon). But he did visit Bethel then. It is strange that he came to the object he hated so much. Later in his 1938 volume he repeated this information.