Saturday, 2 November 2019

9 - Wife number 3: Bambina




Albert Delmont Jones (now calling himself Albert Royal Delmont) married Bambina Maude Scott on September 29, 1904. He was around 50 years old at the time and (if the 1920 census is to be believed) she was 21. A 1922 newspaper has a claim that her first husband was a Cincinnati millionaire. Cincinnati was certainly one of ADJ’s past locations. (Interview question: “Tell me, Bambie, what was it about this 50 year old millionaire that first attracted you to him?”) Bambina liked the name Delmont and kept it through several subsequent marriages, including John Hopper and Cassius Wood. In 1922 she was last heard of (under the Delmont name) planning to marry a Lawrence Johnson.

In the newspapers she is sometimes Bambina Maud Delmont and sometimes Maud Bambina Delmont and Maud sometimes has an E on the end, and sometimes not. But the “Delmont” is consistent.

Bambina liked getting married, but didn’t always finish the paperwork for her divorces and was subsequently charged with bigamy on one occasion.


In the 1920 census returns she was running her own shop in Los Angeles selling and fitting corsets.

Bambina’s claim to fame (or infamy) is her part in the Roscoe Arbuckle scandal. Fatty Arbuckle was a silent film comedian who was huge (in more than one way) in his day. He is probably remembered in film circles today as the man who gave Buster Keaton his start in the movies.

Arbuckle was savaged by the media when he was suddenly arrested and accused of rape and murder after a 1921 party in San Francisco. The victim was a small part actress named Virginia Rappe. The charge was subsequently reduced to manslaughter. Arbuckle went through two hung juries before being cleared at a third trial where the jury were out for all of six minutes, using five of them to write a statement making a formal apology to him for the injustice he had suffered.

There was little doubt that Virginia Rappe’s death was preventable. Health problems exacerbated by a series of abortions made her fragile, and she didn’t get prompt or proper care when she was taken ill. But the lurid accusations against Arbuckle all originated with Rappe’s companion who crashed the party, namely Bambina Maud Delmont. While Wikipedia cannot be called the most accurate of sources, it does quite a nice line in character assassination: “Delmont had a long criminal record with multiple convictions for racketeering, bigamy, fraud and extortion, and allegedly was making a living by luring men into compromising positions and capturing them in photographs, to be used as evidence in divorce proceedings.”  The Weekly World News in 1961 veered into alliteration by accusing her of being a “Tinseltown tart.” Her unsubstantiated testimony at the original hearing got Arbuckle indicted, but then the prosecution deliberately kept her far away from all the actual trials, because her obvious inability to tell truth from fiction would have immediately sunk their case.

So this was the third Mrs ADJ.

When you consider ADJ’s history after his “fall from grace,” it would appear that some people just seem made for each other.

Albeit briefly.



6 comments:

  1. One presumes you've come across the book "The Day the Laughter Stopped". Here is a link to Google Books: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=sL7QBAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=the+day+the+laughter+stopped&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiIlNyc09HlAhUytXEKHZCpC5oQ6AEIKTAA#v=onepage&q=the%20day%20the%20laughter%20stopped&f=false If one inputs Delmont in the search box a few snippets are conjured up. One notes that the ebook is available for £2.99 and one wonders whether there may be more details about what happened to Bambina in its pages. In any case, more details of the court case may be of interest.
    There was a detailed review of the book in a Coventry paper in 1977 headlined 'The Night the Party Ended For Fatty'.
    Paula Wilcox (that wide-eyed English actress) once played Bambina, so reported a column in 1989 with the spiffing title 'The Perils of Paula' - the relevance of which headline will not pass you by.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh, almost forgot - the book 'The Fatty Arbuckle Case' includes the morsel that at the time of the trial, Bambina's FULL name was Bambina Maude Delmont MONTGOMERY.
    I don't know much about this genealogy lark, but that may help track down what happened to her.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Many thanks for your comments, OOS. When I first researched the subject I bought the book you mention (by David Yallop) and also re-read all the relevant sections before publishing the current series of revised articles. Alas, it doesn't say what happened to Bambina and I think Yallop would have said if he had found out. (He has died in recent yeaars so I cannot ask him). I tried researching the man Bambina was supposed to marry in 1922, and found him - but later in life (although married to someone) he was living in lodgings without a wife as a "theatrical." I even found his photograph wearing the most ridiculous hairpiece you could imagine. But no evidence he and Bambina ever married.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It seems strange that Bambina should disappear so well. For such a self-publicist this was uncharacteristic.

    She is in the 1900 census for Lincoln, Nebraska, under the name Maud Scott. She is 17. She has an older brother named Jay C Scott. He is 19. Jay’s draft registration card for World War 1 has Maude Hopper, sister, down as next of kin. Jay’s history can be traced down to a military grave marker in 1960, but there is no sign of his sister. And they sound the sort of family who maybe didn’t keep on touch.

    She had other sisters, Helen, Ethel (reportedly married seven times) and Lucille, but their names disappear.

    As noted in an earlier comment, David Yallop wrote the definitive history of the Fatty Arbuckle case in The Day the Laughter Died, and over several decades managed to track down and interview each of Arbuckle's three wives. But even he loses sight of Bambina in 1922.

    ReplyDelete
  5. We don't even know when she died.
    She doesn't have a wiki page.

    ReplyDelete
  6. True, and as noted above in comments it is a surprise that such a self-publicist should disappear so completely. If anyone can solve the mystery, please do.

    ReplyDelete