Wednesday, 17 June 2020

Kinemo 4


This article could be subtitled:
IT DOES HELP IF YOU GET THE BASIC FACTS RIGHT

There was quite an amazing review of the Kinemo Film “Imperial Valley,” published by Paul Johnson in his paper for September 1925.

"BRO. RUTHERFORD TAKING A TRIP THROUGH IMPERIAL VALLEY, CALIFORNIA"

"The picture shows Bro. R. and party in an automobile, ready for the tour. Then it shows them driving to some of his friends, to ask them if they would allow their son to go with him through Imperial Valley to take pictures. The boy's parents readily consented to let him go with the judge, though they were all prepared to start on a trip of their own through the mountains. The boy kisses his family good-bye, jumps into Bro. R.'s car, and away they go. Then the pictures go on to show Bro. R. passing through the valley on foot, examining fruit, vegetables and many other things grown there. According to the pictures, everything certainly was in good condition. Of course, the picture shows Bro. R. walking through these gardens, which takes up quite a time. On one occasion he is pictured as looking around and laughing as he turns over a very large pumpkin, saying: `It reminds me of the pumpkin pies mother used to make.'

Then the picture changes. It shows Bro. Rutherford's party with a newspaper giving the picture of a terrible automobile accident. Then the auto is shown falling down the side of a steep mountain, the occupants falling out and all being killed—they were the boy's family. Thereupon Bro. R. is seen trying to comfort the boy. It also shows Bro. R. writing a letter and handing it to the boy, telling him not to open it until when in 1925 he would hear of Abraham being resurrected. Later, the pictures show the boy in 1925 reading a morning paper with large head lines: 'ABRAHAM RESURRECTED IN PALESTINE.' Suddenly it dawns on the boy to read the letter the judge had given him. He looks at the calendar, which shows 1925; then he opens the letter, which tells him to telegraph Abraham and ask him that his famliy might be resurrected and restored to him. Finally, the boy is shown very happy as he telegraphs Abraham in Palestine in 1925."


This would be a fascinating film to see with JFR in such a prominent acting role. It’s a shame the Oscars didn’t start until 1929. There is only one slight problem with all of this – the description and review is FALSE FROM START TO FINISH.
                                                                                                             
We can see the actual film today because a copy has survived, although missing a little footage at the end of the reel. The reference has already been given in an earlier article, but it is given here again:

https://youtu.be/-zIClU8TQtM                                  

The Imperial Valley film is just a travelog, taking you around the area, showing roads being built, ditches beng dug and produce being harvested, as an illustration of what could be possible for the earth in the future. That is about it. As noted in an earlier article, JFR appears briefly in long shot looking over a field, a bit like an Alfred Hitchcock cameo.


When you read the small print Johnson tries to excuse himself:

“The Editor never saw these moving pictures, but sometime ago one of the brethren sent him a brief description of them.”

So that’s all right then. It’s someone else’s responsibility. 

Taking his words at face value, one of the brethren must have been just  “messing around.”            

And none of his readers apparently noticed.

With grateful thanks to Zion’s Herald for bringing this amusing item to our attention.

4 comments:

  1. “There was quite an amazing review … published by Paul Johnson in his paper for September 1925.”

    This is very interesting how Paul S. L. Johnson, the self-entitled “Epiphany Messenger,” was so wrong in his review. Was this published in The Herald of the Epiphany?

    Apparently, one of his adherents was indeed “messing around,” in this case, in apparent deception in fabricating an anecdote.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This particular paper was The Present Truth. The thrust of Johnson's article was to accept the "review" and thereby accuse JFR of deception. Which was somewhat ironic in the circumstances.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you, ironic indeed. I messed-up the title of his paper, it should be: The Present Truth and Herald of Christ's Epiphany.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great series of articles as always Jerome! Thank you so much!

    ReplyDelete